Hard bedding has a negative effect on the time that cow to lies down and gets up to go to the feeder and drinker. It is also a stressor for cows and may cause mechanically joint pad inflammation. Since clean bedding means : “less mastitis, less milk loss, less flies, less foot disease, less somatic cells and less total bacteria” . It is very important for dairy farmers to do a comparison on the cost of using sand / straw / rubber mats becomes important for cows and farmers before making informed decision.

Sand

From a bacteriological point of view, sand is the first choice for the reduction of IMI caused by environmental bacteria.

As an inorganic material, it does not support the growth of environmental bacteria and it usually has lower bacterial counts than organic materials, so teat exposure is lower, as is the risk of mastitis in dairy cows. However, we must consider availability and price.

Also, it needs special manure handling systems which tend to be expensive. When new facilities are planned, arrangements can be made for the use of sand, but to use sand on a farm which is not prepared for this can be a huge problem.

It is also possible to recycle the sand to reduce bedding costs. Some farmers leave used sand in a pile for a few months and organic matter from manure is composted and reduced. Others, in larger units, prefer to wash the sand. In both cases, the goal is to obtain sand with less than 2% of organic matter.

Some types of fine sand become harder when in the freestall because of the weight of the cow. In this case, it is important to till it once a day or every two days, to achieve a correct protective effect against mastitis in dairy cows.

This is also important in order to avoid small piles of sand between freestalls. With this operation we have a better use of the sand and the comfort of the freestall is improved.

The following are cow litter materials and costs for stall beddings:

Sand as inorganic bedding material

As a cow bedding sand is preferred because of its soft and non-microbial inorganic structure. Sand considered the “gold standard” for US farmers. Various scientific studies have been carried out to ensure that the material in the bedding ( sand ) is inorganic sand animal litter. Each bedding material has advantages and disadvantages.

Table 3 Bacterial growth examined source Godden et al 2008

Bedding materials 0-72hK. Pneumoniae (cfu /ml)E. faecium (cfu/ml)pHC (%)N (%)
Clean sand1.07a-1.65a8.15A0.28A0.01A
Recycled sand1.91b0.27b8.37B1.13B0.04A
Digested solids3.16c0.09b8.90C46.22C1.99B
Savings1.44a-4.50c4.27D53.02D0.35C
Table 3 Bacterial growth examined : source Godden et al ( 2008)

a-;Different superscripts indicate a significant difference (p<0.05) in bacterial growth amid bedding types at an incubation period of 72h.
A-CDifferent superscripts indicate a significant difference (p<0.05) in biochemical characteristics amid bedding types.

Sand has a positive influence on the production of dairy cows because

It provides a comfortable lying surface, which enhances overall cow health because of the following findings:

Advantages of using sand bedding

  • The loose sand on the walkways creates a better and more gripping  with the added friction. Cow slippage can reduce in hot conditions. Provides better slip resistance.
  • Less claw trimming is necessary because it provides homogeneous claw wear.
  • Sand is a good material for quick drainage.
  • Cows in the sand are clean, especially the udder area looks very clean and healthy. Clean animals Dirt score 1-2

Disadvantages of using sand bedding

  • The bedding sand should be leveled daily with a rake to ensure and maintain the comfortability of the cows.
  • The sand must have a maximum granule size of 2 mm.
  • The sand should not contain small, large or sharp stones. Especially small and sharp stones can get into their nails and sting.
  • Sand can stick to the cow’s udder and it may not be easy to get rid of.

Sand use and management

The deep stall pit should completely fill with sand . Sand height should be at least 45-60 cm.

Every 1 cm of less sand = 11 minutes less lying time..

In order to compensate for the reduced sand at stalls, +1.5 cm, 25 kg of sand per animal per day should be added to the bedding. This means extra work, labor, vehicle expenses and materials.

KUM ve malzemeli derin durak ölçüleri

Cost of sand using

If we assume that this used sand material is recovered from 80% recycling! The reserve, which will meet the need for an additional 2 tons of sand and 25 tons of water (8+17= 25-€) per animal annually, must be obtained on site or within 3 km.

Calculations show: Per animal per year with 9 tons of sand approximately 3-€. The cost of sand management found to be 4- €/ animal. 110 tons of water per animal per year for washing sand and cleaning with water used; operating cost: 0,68 €/ton

The daily sand operating cost is calculated as 0.09-€/cow.

Sand-laden manure management systems : https://www.agproud.com/articles/55968-maximizing-roi-of-sand-laden-manure-management-systems

Applications and references

One of the exemplary leading farm which is a sand animal litter user in Turkey, is is ACIPAYAM ATASANCAK tarım işletmesi agricultural enterprise. In the farm where 950 cows are milked; 9,000 tons of water and 600 tons of sand are used daily. While 85% of the water and 80% of the sand used provide an economic contribution with the recycling system, it does not have a negative impact on the environment. 2014

ATASANCAK TARIM İŞETMESİ DATAS

Investments costs of sand bedding

Advantages
Constrains

SAND Process

The floor sub mat POLSTA is used to reduce daily liter sand, straw, sawdust need and increase softness.

Calculations show: Per animal/ year with 9 tons of sand approximately 3-€. The cost of sand management found to be 4- €/ animal. 110 tons of water per animal per year for washing sand and cleaning with water used; operating cost: 0,68 €/ton. LİNK

The farms use sand generally do not use scrapers. sand has a very high abrasive effect on scrapers, all machinery, equipment and concrete. If a scraper is to be used, it must be special and rubber lipped. For this reason, it is generally cleaned by flushing system.

Vacuum cleans the alley in one pass, allowing more time to properly fill and groom freestall bedding. Minimized time in they alleyway means reduced wear and tear on equipment. In efficiency tests, Manure Vacuum was able to clean a 330 cow group (on 3x milking) in less than 10 minutes – including unloading! the Manure Vacuum replaces the need for pumps, augers, and concrete channels to transport manure from the barn to the storage lagoon or process facility.

Referances https://www.mclanahan.com/blog/doing-these-3-things-will-allow-you-to-maximize-your-sand-bedding

From an economic point of view, sand is not economically positive as a bedding material

ChapterAdvantagesConstrains
Sand-Comfort
-inorganic
-Dry
-Cool
-Traction
-Heavy
-Freezes in cold weather
-Labour intensive
Cost-Cheap if readily available
-Financial cost can be recouped
by well managed investment
-More expensive in areas
further from beaches and rivers
-Cost dependent of lorry transport
Housing-Soft bedding
-Sand on concrete increases grip
-Reusable if recycled
-Manure handling
-Wearing of machinery
-Recycling is expensive
Behavior-Laying times > 12 hours
-Standing times < 2 hours
-Sand provides cushioning and
traction for rising and laying down
-Increased walking behavior
Increased feeding and drinking
-Less stress
-Each 1 cm less sand= -11
minutes less laying time
-Cows digging = loss of sand
Health-Significantly less
environmental mastitis
Lover bacteria counts in bedding
-50% less coliform bacteria compared
to saw dust in teat swabs
-85% less Klebsiella compared
to saw dust in teat swabs
-42% less lameness
-75% less hock abrasions
-Sand can be abrasive if the layer is too thin
-More lesions on dorsal tuber calcis
Production-Increased laying times
-Increased rumination + increased blood flow
-Less stress = More production
-Lame cows recover faster ( less production loss)
Takes time for cows get used to sand
Slightly production loss possible during
transition possible
Legislation-Solid floor is low NH3 emission system
-Improved housing is a part of regulation
to improve dairy cow welfare
Legislation due to change about
spreading waste on fields
EthicsSand approved by both utilitarian and
deontological views for providing cow
good comfort and improved health
Potential for sand to be marketed as a
good animal welfare and mislead public
as to poor management practices
Concluding Table

Bedding materials and liters comparison: Sand/ straw / Rubber mat

Straw cow bedding littering

inek altlıkları ve inek altlık malzemeleri
inek altlıkları inek yatağı sap saman inek altlık malzemeleri

Cost comparisons of deep straw beddings / elevated rubber mattress and KRAIBURG

Cost of Deep stall with straw littering

Straw260kg/ cow30-€ /ton7,80-€
Lime260kg/ cow35-€ /ton9,10-€
Loading & removing10 min/ cow12-€/ h2,00-€
Distribution20 min/ cow12-€/ h4,00-€
Maintenance & Leveling245 min/cow12-€/ h49,00-€
ANNUAL COST                      71,90 €  

Cost of ELEVATED stall with rubber mat

RUBBER Mats*8 years life170 Euro/stall21,25 €
Fine chopped straw40 kg/a0,18-Euro/kg  7,20 €
Saw dust (alternative)0,53 M3/a8-Euro/M34,25 €
Straw10 min/ cow12-Euro/h2,00 €
Maintenance60-90 min/cow12-Euro/h18,00 €
ANNUAL COST48,45 €
*KRAIBURG laying mats warranties are 10 years but life span is quite longer.

Sources: Heidenreich Thomas, oral presentation at LFL saxonia, Köllitsch,Germany 2007